Re: [ublas] bug on compressed_matrix ?

Subject: Re: [ublas] bug on compressed_matrix ?
From: Riccardo Rossi (rrossi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-16 14:16:34

Hi all,

this is just to comment that in my opinion it would be crucially important
to be very conformant to the CSR standard, since this makes a lot easier
using external sovlers

Riccardo

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Thomas Klimpel <Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden]
> wrote:

> Hoang Giang Bui wrote:
> > Yes, I need the correct csr format as standard since we rely on ublas
> > for computing element stiffness matrix and global stiffness matrix stem
> > from structural problem. Furthermore, I need to take the transpose of
> > ublas matrix to feed in a subroutine to compute the restriction operator
> > in our multilevel solver. This subroutine uses the compressed data for
> > speed purpose. This behaviour causes segmentation false error in my code
> > since it read a negative number of entries in the last row.
>
> Can you try calling the "complete_index1_data()" member function and see
> whether it fixes your problem? (You still have to take care that
> "index2_data()" and "value_data()" return references to arrays whose actual
> size is "meaningless".)
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: rrossi_at_[hidden]
>