From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-03 06:52:37
>John's approach is probably better. But there should be a comment
>explaining why it is being done - if someone just casually glanced at the
>code they might think it was a mistake and remove it.
On second thought, in most cases couldn't BOOST_TEST be used instead of
assert - I realise this involves some reworking of old code, but it might
be worth it in the long run?
- John Maddock
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk