Re: [boost] Building boost.

From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-03 06:52:37

>John's approach is probably better.  But there should be a comment 
>explaining why it is being done - if someone just casually glanced at the 
>code they might think it was a mistake and remove it.

On second thought,  in most cases couldn't BOOST_TEST be used instead of
assert - I realise this involves some reworking of old code, but it might
be worth it in the long run?

- John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/