From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-06 13:34:59
> Some general comments:
> * I would like to make Comeau C++ boost-friendly, and would like ideas
> to such an effect (notwithstanding the below, I don't have anything
> specific in mind, and as such, this is just an open-ended statement).
Preprocessor speed! In many cases, we've had to bend over backwards to work
around the speed of Comeau C++'s preprocesser (and EDG's in general).
Specifically, most everything in the preprocessor library, and many things in
both the Python library and the MPL--those are just the ones that I know of.
When the MPL is finished, it is likely to be a much more commonly included
library than the Python library (or the preprocessor library) for normal
projects. Right now, we are having to provide pre-expanded files to include if
the preprocessor is from EDG.
Any examples that you need to reproduce this behavior I can provide in quantity:
Other than the speed, I otherwise like the functionality of Comeau C++'s
preprocessor. It works like it should (unlike both Metrowerks and VC at this
time) and is predictable.
Peprocessing in non-strict mode (on Win32) can be significantly faster (though
not *fast*) than preprocessing in strict mode. Why is this and what is the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk