[boost] Re: boost::execution_monitor impl under windows

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-26 09:21:29

David Abrahams wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> > Dave A. should better fix the C++ std instead of hacking with MS SEH.
> >
> >> 5. What would be an ideal behavior?
> >
> > A) WG21 mandates 2-phase EH
> 
> Please don't go around announcing what I "should better fix" at least
> until you've written a real proposal for whatever you think is better
> than the status quo.  Trying to convince the world that _I_ should be
> responsible for pushing some idea I don't even understand 
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You do. At this point. I'm pretty sure. C'mon, it's time to concede.

>                                                           through the
> committee without being willing to carefully explain it and defend its
> superiority is truly despicable. 

Maybe. I see it as kinda "cheap outsourcing". ;-)
 
regards,
alexander.

P.S. Dave, BTW, ("somewhat" related to exceptions business)

http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/austin-group-l/msg06116.html
http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/austin-group-l/msg06118.html
(Subject: New cancelation points -- "compatibility" issue?)

http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/austin-group-l/msg06126.html
(see "XSH ERN 76...")