From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-25 09:10:24
"Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> safe_bool is an idiom, not a library component. Anyone's already free
>> to use the idiom. I don't think we can review it on that basis.
> Hmmm... It would be nice if we had only one implementation somewhere
> in utilities perhaps. A single implementation will help avoid reimplementing
> the same wheel. Yes, it's a simple code, but there are some hidden issues
> such as Borland's inability to grok the member pointer trick.
> IIUC, what you mean is that we do not have to review something like
Right, we can only review implemented components.
> Ok, but it would still be good to have a single implementation.
Well, then of course we could review it.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk