[boost] Re: boost v 1.33 ?

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-01 11:41:29

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:

>> In at least one case, there's a new compiler which wasn't
>> tested at 1.32 at all.
>
> Which one? If it wasn't tested with 1.32, it shouldn't appear as a
> regression.
>

Actually there are two:

a) the one labeled cw-9.3 is codewarrior 9.3 for the Mac OS X.  This is new
combination since the release of 1.32 .  The issues remaining to be sorted
out is which of two standard library implementations to use, etc.

b) sunpro 5_3 is also a new platform.  Its showing yellow so I suppose its
not a regression.

Robert Ramey