Re: [boost] Feature Request

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-04 02:55:18

At 22:40 2005-11-03, Abajyan, Hambardzum wrote:
>Hi
>(I've already been subscribed my address as you told me to do.)
>
>I would like to now why there isn't an implementation of TCP(UDP)
>Sockets ?
>I think it's possible to write a good platform-independent architecture
>based on Berkeley socket interface (supporting asynchronous
>(non-blocking) sockets), because both Linux and Windows systems support
>that architecture.
>There are many libraries like that: e.g. Boost.Thread library which is
>also platform-independent. In my opinion, this feature is very usefull
>as with it programmers can develop network applications on Boost.
>Thanks

I like the approach these guys are taking:   http://www.dtilib.dk/
that actually would be 3 libraries, but I like them all.

>
>Best Regards Hambik
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"