From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-08 08:09:16
Anthony Williams wrote:
> "Cory Nelson" <phrosty_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 2) It doesn't spin at all - giving an app a chance to stay away from
>> WaitForSingleObject on multithreaded systems will be a good boost to
>> scalability under typical use. Win32 critical sections have a
>> default spin count of 4000 on multithreaded systems. With
>> multi-core getting more and more common I think this is an important
>> aspect to consider.
> Yes, it's worth considering. I would be intrigued to see what
> difference it made. I have a dual-core system and a single-core
> system, so I could see how it performed on both with/without
> spinning. Any ideas for how to construct a benchmark?
I would advise against spinning. Spinning is a bit of a gamble; it may or
may not be a win depending on several factors (average critical section
length, spin count, whether other threads in ready state can make better use
of the CPU time, context switch performance) and the optimal spin count is
It isn't a problem if the user gambles with his own money, so to speak, i.e.
spins manually with try_lock. However it can be a problem if the
implementation gambles with the user's money and loses, since there is no
way to make it not spin. IOW, you can easily turn a non-spinning mutex into
a spinning mutex, but not vice versa.
It's true that spinning can improve the performance of the "average
application" but you have to have data on that average application... and it
still might be a loss for a specific application.
In addition, spinning is more suitable for ordinary mutexes, since their
critical sections are expected to be short, and hence the probability that a
thread will spin while the thread holding the mutex is scheduled on the same
core is low (a situation where spinning is a guaranteed loss.)
A read-write mutex, on the other hand, can easily have a longer writer
critical section that can span multiple quantums, and hence, it can be
better for readers not to spin in order to get out of the writer's way as
quickly as possible... since a sluggish writer can block many readers in a
worst case scenario.
It would be hard to determine the optimal spin count for the "average
application" by using benchmarks... you don't know how to represent the
average app in a benchmark. It could be possible if the optimal spin count
stays relatively constant during varying scenarios, I guess...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk