Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-22 09:35:16

Next message: Andreas Huber: "Re: [boost] [inspect] Contents in XML <legalnotice> sections not checked for L & C issues?"
Previous message: Andreas Huber: "[boost] Upcoming fixes for L & C issues in "abandoned" libraries"
In reply to: Andreas Huber: "[boost] [inspect] Contents in XML <legalnotice> sections not checked for L & C issues?"
Next in thread: Andreas Huber: "Re: [boost] [inspect] Contents in XML <legalnotice> sections not checked for L & C issues?"
Reply: Andreas Huber: "Re: [boost] [inspect] Contents in XML <legalnotice> sections not checked for L & C issues?"

Andreas Huber wrote:
> Hi Rene
>
> It seems that the <legalnotice> sections in Boostbook xml files are not
> checked for L & C issues. Is there any chance that such a feature could
> be added to the inspect tool before 1.34 goes out? That would surely
> uncover many more L & C problems.

Could point out an example?

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo

Next message: Andreas Huber: "Re: [boost] [inspect] Contents in XML <legalnotice> sections not checked for L & C issues?"
Previous message: Andreas Huber: "[boost] Upcoming fixes for L & C issues in "abandoned" libraries"
In reply to: Andreas Huber: "[boost] [inspect] Contents in XML <legalnotice> sections not checked for L & C issues?"
Next in thread: Andreas Huber: "Re: [boost] [inspect] Contents in XML <legalnotice> sections not checked for L & C issues?"
Reply: Andreas Huber: "Re: [boost] [inspect] Contents in XML <legalnotice> sections not checked for L & C issues?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk