From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-06 10:13:00
Jeff Garland wrote:
> Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>> Ames Andreas wrote:
>>> I beg to differ, at least somehow. Although I'm with you, that a
>>> whole ORB implementation would not even remotely be feasible, I think
>>> a more constraint approach could be both interesting and useful.
> I've added a note to the Wiki to this effect -- hopefully warning students
> away. I see no way that this project is feasible within the time constraints
> of an SoC project, so it's unlikely that the mentoring team will approve it.
> The scope would need to be much more limited and defined.
Out of curiosity: What's the relationship between an ORB and boost.org, and
why would boost.org want to have its own ?
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk