From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-06 10:14:20
Ames Andreas wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeff Garland
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 3:49 PM
>> Subject: Re: [boost] [soc] orb project was (asio projects)
>> The scope would need to be much more limited and defined.
> How can I do that? Should I directly edit the wiki?
> If so, should I edit the proposal or write a new one?
> Or should I write a summary of the ideas mentioned in this
> thread (concerning this project) to the list?
That would be a start, but I'm still concerned there isn't enough depth in any
of the discussion of a reasonable project size. I can see CDR archive for
serialization lib as doable -- too small really.
Frankly the only way I can see something going towards ORB implementation is
if the student had some significant experience with ACE/TAO/Boost and could
show that the project would be doable. Not trying to discourage, but a couple
months go really quick...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk