From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-19 17:24:54
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Peter Dimov
> Sohail Somani wrote:
> > A fine reason, but why would you want to lump it in with
> <thread>? Or
> > alternatively, require <thread> to depend on <pthread.h>? Looks like
> > there should be another proposal to add <pthread.h> to the
> I've tried to address some of these questions in N2178,
> sections III and IV.
It was my fault for not reading the whole thing (its pretty frickin
long!) but I get it now.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk