From: JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-24 08:29:18
----- Mensaje original -----
De: Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval_at_[hidden]>
Fecha: Sábado, Marzo 24, 2007 12:16 pm
Asunto: Re: [boost] [Report] 79 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-03-22)
> Joe Gottman wrote:
> > Zach Laine wrote:
> >> On 3/22/07, Douglas Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>> Boost Regression test failures
> >>> Report time: 2007-03-22T00:20:02Z
> >>> This report lists all regression test failures on release
> >>> Detailed report:
> >>> http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-
> >>> |optional|
> >>> optional_test: msvc-6.5 msvc-6.5 msvc-6.5_stlport4 msvc-7.0
> >>> optional_test_ref_fail2: msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0
> > I think that optional_test_ref_fail2 has been removed from
> > the list of tests, so these two can be ignored.
> Or better, make the test suite ignore them.
> Fernando claimed to have fixed the optional_test failure, and to
> have removed the optional_test_ref_fail2 test completely a few
> *weeks* ago, but still they show up. How can that be? Something
> is fishy here... Was he wrong?
In this post:
Fernando suggests that the optional_test regressions for
MSVC 6.5/7.0 be marked as expected failures, but this hasn't
been done yet. I can take care of this next Monday unless
someone does it before.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk