Re: [boost] Looking for Time Series reviews

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-07 13:02:16

Matias Capeletto wrote:
> On 8/6/07, John Phillips <phillips_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>    To date there have been no reviews of the time series library posted
>> to the developer or user lists. Is this a bad time for a review, or is
>> no one interested enough in this library to put in the time to submit one?
>>    If you feel the library isn't interesting or useful enough, please
>> post a note to the list so I can see that opinion. If you are struggling
>> for time to do the review, please post at least a short opinion, and if
>> a few days extension will make a difference we can investigate that
>> possibility. However, the next review begins on August 13, so time for
>> this is somewhat limited.
> 
> I really want to participate but I gave my last exam last week and now
> I am heading to an Open Source congress for a week. I think I will not
> have time for a formal review there :(
> 
> I have already give Eric feedback a month ago, and I think the library
> is a nice inclusion for piece wise manipulation series like the ones
> found in banking account management.
> 
> I am not convinced that is the best approach for a general discrete
> signals framework where to build up digital systems libraries, like
> FIR and IIR filters, filter networks or non linear and adaptive
> filters. 

<snip>

Matias, if you summarize your DSP design ideas for the list, then I can 
tell everyone what I told you ... that a similar design was tried for 
Time_series and found not to work in practice.

I asked you to try writing generic algorithms using the concepts you 
designed. Have you?

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com