Re: [boost] [boostbook] development as general-purpose C++documentation tool?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-31 12:39:55

Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> I'm curious if anyone is working on making boostbook less
> boost-specific and easier to use for non-boost projects?  There seems
> to be a niche for it, as I currently find myself using it for a
> non-boost library, as someone who has grown frustrated with Doxygen
> not quite understanding the source code correctly, and being unable
> to easily override its mistakes.

Yes please!  Or quickbook anyway :-)

I even suggested this as an SOC project, but we had not one single 
application! :-(

Hopefully the IDB folks can move in this direction, but I've lost track of 
what progress they've made recently...  John.