Re: [boost] [pimpl] Proposal. Determining interest.

From: Marc Mutz (marc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-01 11:55:08

On Monday 22 October 2007 09:37, batov wrote:
> An overwhelming :-) interest in the proposed Pimpl has certainly been
> overwhelming. LOL.
>
> The Pimpl idiom has certainly been beaten up and its complexity/importance
> is far from, say, a threading library. Havings said that I feel that the
> simple Pimpl deployment technique and the suggested Pimpl interface is
> simple, elegant and pleasant to use with no drawbacks that I can see so
> far.
>
> I've updated and uploaded (as Pimpl-02.zip) the pimpl interface that
> implements both value- and pointer-semantics. Any comments are most
> welcome.
<snip>

 
> Inherited Pimpls 
>
> sdfsd 
>
>  
> Polymorphic Implementations 
>  
> sdfs

I'd very much like to see those sections, or even only how you'd go about 
re-using a pimpl_ptr from a base class, inheriting Derived::Impl from 
Base::Impl.?

Thanks,
Marc

-- 
Marc Mutz -- marc_at_[hidden], mutz_at_[hidden]
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, Platform-independent software solutions