From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-07 05:49:27
>[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Hugo Duncan
>Sent: 06 December 2007 20:48
>Subject: Re: [boost] [rfc] Quadrature library for numerical
>One of the questions I pondered was whether I should use
>or not. In the end I opted to use it, and I think it works
>thirteen parameters does however slow the compiler quite
With the GSoC Visualization using SVG written by Jake Voytko, the use of Boost.Parameter has not proved a good idea as a way of
providing a zillion optional parameters. Jake is in the process of refactoring to remove it.
The effect on compile time is very bad (to me entirely unacceptable) and the method of chaining (every member function returns
*this) so you can write
that Jake also used has proved much faster and just as convenient (in fact it allows a much nicer and more flexible layout).
So I strongly recommend against using Boost.Parameter based on this experience.
--- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk