Boost logo

Boost :

From: Ilya Sokolov (fal_delivery_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-26 17:01:22


Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>>>>>>> 2. Unfortunately original test modult function signature is
unacceptable for DLL initialization. So i had to introduce new one.
[snip]
>> I still don't see why is it unacceptable. Can you state it explicitly?
>
> Hmm. How to state it more explicitly. How about this:
>
> It does not link.

i.e.,
boost::unit_test::test_suite* init_unit_test_suite( int, char* [] )
link, but
bool init_unit_test()
doesn't link?

>> Problem arise with library that should work on both platforms, with
and without dll support.
>
> What platforms are you talking about?

dos/djgpp

> Why the solutions I provided are not satisfactory?

they are too complex for such simple problem


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk