Re: [boost] Switch namespace

From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-13 10:47:51

AMDG

Zach Laine wrote:
>> How about:
>>         boost::control_flow
>>         boost::switch_case
>> ?
>>
>> (I don't much like either of those, but maybe they'll inspire somebody
>> else).
>>     
>
> Well, usually such compile-time versions of familair runtime
> constructs are called static_*, so how about static_switch?
>   

Well...  It's not really a compile time version of a switch statement.

Thanks for the help.  I think the best suggestions were control/control_flow
although I'm still not entirely happy with them.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe