Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Confused by regression testing "release" branch summary and unresolved issues
From: Richard Webb (richard.webb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-04 18:38:08


Phil Richards wrote:
>
> What is the relationship between these two pages? Is it documented
> anywhere?
>

I think that issues.html might only be displaying issues from compilers that
are marked as 'required platforms' (those being the ones whose names appear
in bold on summary.html).
The compiler list looks a bit out of date though.

Phil Richards wrote:
>
> Is it actually an issue that the release has quite a lot of
> unresolved issues for gcc 4.4?
>

Most of those failures only occur when the compiler is in c++0x mode, though
the failures in GIL do look to be down to bug #3041, which doesn't seem to
have been merged to Release.

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Confused-by-regression-testing-%22release%22-branch-summary-and-unresolved-issues-tp26206179p26206626.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk