Subject: Re: [boost] Updating the Boost Review Process Was: [GGL] Bost.Polygon (GTL) vs GGL - rationale
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 12:13:05
>> - It is working in practice, as I justed described on that new web-page
>> and in the post yesterday.
> Perhaps it is at least as far as you've tested it since fixing some of
> the issues found in the review. The casting bits both explicit and
> implicitly in things like less<double>/greater<double> are still there
> and would mean your GMP types are cast to double for these predicates.
With apologies, I haven't had a chance to get involved in this debate... but
just to let you know that Boost.Math has a number of concept-architypes that
can test for these and other errors:
No need to search around for possible mistakes or casts... if there is an
"instantiate-everything" test, just throw the two real-number architypes at
the templates and see what breaks :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk