Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation

Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation
From: Bjørn Roald (bjorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-07 13:13:50

On Sunday 07 February 2010 06:02:48 pm Paul A. Bristow wrote:

> OK to start a new thread?

We need to smoke out if there are any real strong objections. As far as 
process, there may be a need to for a formal review, mini review, or vote 
count of some sort.  This is somewhat unclear as this is not really a library 
proposal.  Logos are however no small issue.  However, I think simple yes/no 
vote counts has been used in the past.  You should ask how to proceed at this 
point, and if anybody can arrange what is required for formally approving the 
logos.  The best would be is that review manager / vote counter are not 
directly associated with the proposal.

A new thread is a good idea at this point.  The discussion has settled on two 
logo use cases and the two logos presented in the proposal are as good as any 
other proposed.  A new "Proposal ..." thread signals a proposal that the 
general boost list should be able to say yes or no too.   So, I say yes  - go 
ahead with the new thread.

-- 
Bjørn