Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation

Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation
From: Patrick Horgan (phorgan1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-09 04:28:33

Bjørn Roald wrote:
> On Sunday 07 February 2010 06:02:48 pm Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>
>   
>> OK to start a new thread?
>>     
>
> We need to smoke out if there are any real strong objections. As far as 
> process, there may be a need to for a formal review, mini review, or vote 
> count of some sort.  This is somewhat unclear as this is not really a library 
> proposal.  Logos are however no small issue.  However, I think simple yes/no 
> vote counts has been used in the past.  You should ask how to proceed at this 
> point, and if anybody can arrange what is required for formally approving the 
> logos.  The best would be is that review manager / vote counter are not 
> directly associated with the proposal.
>
> A new thread is a good idea at this point.  The discussion has settled on two 
> logo use cases and the two logos presented in the proposal are as good as any 
> other proposed. 
Again I ask, what happened to "PROPOSED FOR"?  Shouldn't it be three?

Patrick