Subject: Re: [boost] [utility/result_of] decltype-based implementation breaking valid code on msvc-10
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-06 06:02:17
Eric Niebler wrote:
> I suspect the real problem is in a buggy implementation of decltype on
> msvc-10. For the upcoming boost release, I suggest that we stick with
> the non-decltype implementation of result_of on msvc-10, or risk
> massively breaking users' code, not to mention proto, spirit and
> xpressive on that compiler.
MSVC10 isn't even released yet.
Why bother with a non-stable compiler?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk