Re: [boost] Provisional Boost.Generic and Boost.Auto_Function (concepts without concepts)

Subject: Re: [boost] Provisional Boost.Generic and Boost.Auto_Function (concepts without concepts)
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-14 08:24:51

On 12/14/2010 7:11 AM, Matt Calabrese wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Dave Abrahams<dave_at_[hidden]>  wrote:
>
>> That said, if all the type difference occurs *within* the decltype
>> *and* within the decltype there are no ODR violations, I *think* there
>> is technically no ODR violation.  But I suggest asking a real
>> hard-core core-language expert on this one if you care about technical
>> correctness.
>>
>
> This is what I'm currently banking on. I'll post to clc++ and see if anyone
> can shed some light here.
>
> This thread is a bit outdated with regards to the library now. I'll push the
> latest Boost.Generic and Boost.Auto_Function to the sandbox in the next
> couple of days.

I see Auto_Function in the sandbox but I do not see Generic. Is it there 
under a different name ?