Subject: Re: [boost] [git] neglected aspects
From: Julian Gonggrijp (j.gonggrijp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-10 10:01:59
Julian Gonggrijp wrote:
> Mika Heiskanen wrote:
>> On 02/09/2012 04:10 PM, Julien Nitard wrote:
>>> This doesn't fit in my small brain when I try to imagine it. Sorry :(
>>> I guess it's time people on both sides fire their slide editors so that I
>>> (and hopefully others) can have a better view of the problem and
>>> the solutions
>> This has pictures:
> A side-by-side visual comparison would probably be a good idea. I'm
> working on such a picture, I hope to send it tomorrow.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3512486/boost_branching_model.pdf (82 kB)
Note (1): my depiction of the current Boost workflow might be
inaccurate. If you see a way to improve the image, please go ahead or
let me know what needs to be changed.
Note (2): to assist those who might want to make derived works, I also
made the original SVG file available. Please note that the work is
licensed under CC BY-SA (refer to the file for a URL).
The file may contain parts that are encoded in extensions to SVG that
are specific to my editor (Inkscape); if the file doesn't work with
your own editor, let me know and I'll produce a "neutral" version.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3512486/boost_branching_model.svg (119 kB)
Note (3): while this image helps to explain my point in , it turns
out from  that I didn't actually address Daniel James' point. I'll
return to the testing issue in a new reply to .
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk