Re: [boost] [log] Most recent version

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Most recent version
From: Charles_J_Wilson_at_[hidden]
Date: 2012-12-31 12:27:35

We've been using the v2 log for over two years now.

We're currently working with r738. We're using it with wstrings (Windows), time stamps, scopes, tags, file rollover, multi-thread and levels.

I highly recommend it.

If you have issues, you'll find Andrey both responsive and helpful.

Charles Wilson
Senior Software Development Engineer
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-
> bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Alexander Arhipenko
> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 5:45 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Most recent version
> 
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Andrey Semashev
> <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > ...
> >> The code is taken from:
> >> https://boost-log.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/boost-log/.
> >> And currently I consider 3 options:
> >> branches/v1
> >
> >
> > This is the most recent version 1.x of Boost.Log. It is no longer
> > developed but is is the most stable version.
> >
> >> branches/bleeding-edge
> >
> >
> > This is the work in progress for v2 of the library. This is the
> > closest thing to what v2 will eventually be and to what will be included to
> Boost.
> > Currently, the code compiles and shaped more or less. However, it may
> > not compile at times and barely tested as this is where development is
> going on.
> >
> >> trunk
> >
> >
> > This is some intermediate v2 that is more stable than bleeding-edge.
> > It is slightly outdated now, I'm planning to merge bleeding-edge to
> > trunk some time soon.
> >
> > The all three versions have source-incompatible differences but in the
> > long run the bleeding-edge interface is what you should be aimed for
> > if you plan to update to newer versions of the library. If you only
> > want some stable version for one time use, you can use the current trunk
> or v1.
> >
> 
> Hi Andrey,
> 
> Thanks for clarification. I think we'll stick with v1 and update to the v2 after
> inclusion into Boost.
> 
> Could you please point to up-to-date documentation?
> I've found this one:
> http://boost-log.sourceforge.net/libs/log/doc/html/index.html.
> But code samples found on a page:
> http://boost-
> log.sourceforge.net/libs/log/doc/html/log/detailed/sources.html
> seems to be out of date, e.g.
> statement lg.strm()<<"message" fails to compile.
> 
> Regards
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost