Re: [boost] [Test][Thread] Regression since 9 December?

Subject: Re: [boost] [Test][Thread] Regression since 9 December?
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-12 11:22:04

Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Le 11/01/15 10:59, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm getting a regression on all the Boost.Thread tests using 
>> Boost.Test to fail after this commit
>> https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/1eaffb96ceec82882a4e947c99735a37271ce303. 
>> See 
>> http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/Sandia-clang-c++11-boost-bin-v2-libs-thread-test-test_2309-test-clang-darwin-4-2-1-debug-threading-multi.html. 
>>
>>
>>
<snip>
>>
>> Do you have an idea how this can be fixed?
>>
> With the help of one of the Boost.Test maintainers, I have reached to 
> fix the issues. Boost.Thread was requesting to link static while 
> Boost.Time didn't. 

Does this change caused undefined reference linker errors (symbols from 
System, Test, Chrono) in regression tests for the latest runs?

http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/Sandia-gcc-4-4-7-c++0x-boost-bin-v2-libs-atomic-test-atomicity-test-gcc-4-4-7-debug-threading-multi.html
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/Sandia-gcc-4-4-7-c++0x-boost-bin-v2-libs-geometry-test-core-access-test-gcc-4-4-7-debug.html
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/Sandia-gcc-4-4-7-c++0x-boost-bin-v2-libs-graph-test-cycle_canceling_test-test-gcc-4-4-7-debug.html
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/Sandia-gcc-4-4-7-c++0x-boost-bin-v2-libs-test-test-algorithms_test-test-gcc-4-4-7-debug.html
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/Sandia-gcc-4-4-7-c++0x-boost-bin-v2-libs-tuple-test-another_tuple_test_bench-test-gcc-4-4-7-debug.html
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/Sandia-gcc-4-4-7-c++0x-boost-bin-v2-libs-utility-test-compressed_pair_test-test-gcc-4-4-7-debug.html

If the answer was yes, then should the Jamfiles be somehow modified?

Regards,
Adam