Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names

Subject: Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-05 22:30:27

On 05.07.2017 18:22, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>
>> Why not build separate 32-bit and 64-bit installers, as lots of other
>> applications do ?
>
> Why does this matter?

Because they could use distinct installation prefixes to avoid conflicts.

        Stefan

-- 
      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...