Re: [boost] [Boost.Yap] Review results

Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.Yap] Review results
From: Zach Laine (whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-03-06 16:24:02

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Seth via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> On 06-03-18 08:19, Gavin Lambert via Boost wrote:
> >
> > Even if positional placeholders are needed, anything that requires at
> > least C++11 should be using std::placeholders instead of defining
> > custom ones, without compelling reason.
>
> Having separate domains for placeholders is pretty obviously powerful,
> and this has been the pattern in Boost Proto before.
>
> The chief difference with the standard library placeholders is that,
> sadly, the standard library placeholders donot afford tag type parameter.
>
> If Yap was "Yet Another Bind" library I'd be tempted to agree with you,
> but AFAICT Yap isn't about that.

Exactly.

Zach