Re: Request to review my GSoc Proposal[Boost multiprecision

From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-04-01 07:24:52

  >>Â I would like to point out that certain parts in this proposal have been>> copied out from my proposal without my permission
> Can you share all the parts where you think the OP has copied?> Because as Chris mentioned it could be a coincidence.
We could also handle the depths of the details of this discussionoff site, if that makes more sense?
David Bellot and I and a few others have already had somelimited communication regarding potential details of thispotential phenomenon off site.
Kind regards, Chris

    On Wednesday, April 1, 2020, 12:40:53 AM GMT+2, madhur4127 via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:  
 
 Boost - Dev mailing list wrote
> I would like to point out that certain parts in this proposal have been
> copied out from my proposal without my permission

Can you share all the parts where you think the OP has copied?

Because as Chris mentioned it could be a coincidence. In fact, it is quite
ordinary for students to write a big integer class themselves as it is
required in competitive programming which the OP says he does. I guess
Number Theoretic algorithms also include GCD, Prime Sieve, Primality testing
which again would have been implemented by any (competitive) programmer.

For all the points you'll mention, OP *should* submit some proof dated prior
to your submission of the proposal.

--
Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost