|
|
Ublas : |
From: Michael Stevens (mail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-07 14:53:30
Hi Gunter, Hi Guimond,
On Thursday, 7. September 2006 17:32, Gunter Winkler wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2006 16:28, Guimond, Alexandre wrote:
> Interesting, the functions can not be distinguished. I always use the
> version with pivoting, which works perfectly.
>
GCC agrees the two function definitions are ambigeous. The two functions in
question are.
line 258:
template<class M, class E>
void lu_substitute (const M &m, vector_expression<E> &e) {
inplace_solve (m, e, unit_lower_tag ());
inplace_solve (m, e, upper_tag ());
line 317:
template<class E, class M>
void lu_substitute (matrix_expression<E> &e, const M &m) {
inplace_solve (e, m, upper_tag ());
inplace_solve (e, m, unit_lower_tag ());
> Maybe one should drop the (IMHO strange) versions of lu substitute for
> solving X A = B .
The function (defined at line 317 ) certainly looks wrong. The argument 'm' is
const. This 'm' is passed to inplace_solver as the second argument this is
not const and is modified to contain the result.
Unless anyone knows what the function is there for and how to code it
correctly I will remove it.
Michael
--
___________________________________
Michael Stevens Systems Engineering
34128 Kassel, Germany
Phone/Fax: +49 561 5218038
Navigation Systems, Estimation and
Bayesian Filtering
http://bayesclasses.sf.net
___________________________________