[boost] Re: compose names

From: Valentin Bonnard (Bonnard.V_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-15 09:56:39

Beman Dawes wrote:
> 
> At 12:04 AM 6/15/99 -0700, Jerry Schwarz wrote:
> 
> >How about something like
> >
> >compose_f_gx
> >compose_f_gx_hx
> >compose_f_gx_hy
> >compose_f_gxy
> >
> >I think those names are transparent enough that I don't need to
> >explain which is
> >which, and I think they're uniform enough that they would be easy to
> >remember.

Great

Resonably scalable (until we need paratheses).

Clear convention: 
- f,g,h are first parameters
- x,y,z are second parameters

> The _f seems redundant.  Could we drop it (and adjust accordingly)?
> 
>   compose_fx
>   compose_fx_gx
>   compose_fx_gy
>   compose_fxy

The result makes no sens now. compose_fx looks like 
function application.

-- 
Valentin Bonnard
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications