[boost] Re: compose names

From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-15 09:46:20

At 12:04 AM 6/15/99 -0700, Jerry Schwarz wrote:

>How about something like
>
>compose_f_gx
>compose_f_gx_hx
>compose_f_gx_hy
>compose_f_gxy
>
>I think those names are transparent enough that I don't need to
explain which is
>which, and I think they're uniform enough that they would be easy to
remember.

The best suggestion so far IMO. Extends nicely too.

The _f seems redundant.  Could we drop it (and adjust accordingly)?

  compose_fx
  compose_fx_gx
  compose_fx_gy
  compose_fxy

--Beman

------------------------------------------------------------------------

eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications