[boost] result of compose discussion

From: Nicolai Josuttis (nicolai.josuttis_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-18 04:19:16

It seems we have worked out a new naming scheme for
the compose function adapters and everybody can
live with it or even likes it.
This is the scheme like compose_f_gx_hy.

I have send a new version of the compose stuff
that reflects this scheme to Beman so that we soon will
have an according update on the Web
(you can find it immediately at http://www.josuttis.com/cppcode/).

For the question of "nonary_function" "nullary_function",
"niladic_function", "voidary_function", ...
it seems we get more and more suggestions.
So, for the moment I stay with "nonary_function".

Thanks all and best regards
-- 
Nicolai M. Josuttis
Solutions in Time
http://www.josuttis.de/
mailto:solutions_at_[hidden]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications