[boost] Re: result of compose discussion

From: Nathan Myers (ncm_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-18 04:44:20

> For the question of "nonary_function" "nullary_function",
> "niladic_function", "voidary_function", ...
> it seems we get more and more suggestions.
> So, for the moment I stay with "nonary_function".

"Nonary" is abominable, but should remain as a goad until somebody 
comes up with a good reason to favor one among the others.  What's 
wrong with "nonary"?  First, it implies nine arguments.  

Of the suggestions I have seen, niladic or nullary seem best.

Nathan Myers
ncm_at_[hidden]

------------------------------------------------------------------------

eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications