[boost] Re: result of compose discussion

From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-19 23:13:54

>>> names like one_arg_function, two_arg_function, and so on
>>
>>This is the best one I've heard so far, and I don't think it can be improved
>>upon.
>
> Sounds like a challenge to me :-) !
>
> IMHO the proposal that_ used digits had one "improved" feature.  So how
> about fun_0_arg, fun_1_arg, fun_2_arg etc?
>
> Consider how the names sort in an index etc?

These names are more "fun"<g>, but I'm unconvinced that they're better. The
other ones parse like real english.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications