[boost] Re: timer classes

From: Valentin Bonnard (Bonnard.V_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-01 08:12:44

Dave Abrahams wrote:
> 
> > Dave Abrahams wrote:
> >
> >> 2. why the implementation is stored as a reference. While the code looks
> >> correct, reference members are a dicey proposition in general, and hard to
> >> get right.
> >
> > Why ?
> 
> Because the default assignment semantics are seldom what you want.

1) here the code redefine the default assignment semantics

2) there is no default assignment semantics at all

-- 
Valentin Bonnard
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications