|
Boost : |
From: Valentin Bonnard (Bonnard.V_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-01 08:19:39
Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
> > I have written such classes but with just one type T.
> >
> > (See
> > http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/bonnard/NewLibs/Utils/comparison_ops.H)
> >
>
> You don't like using multiple-inheritance for TotallyOrdered?
>
> I'm not sure we should have competing submissions in the same domain. It's
> enough work to refine a single submission.
1) unlike some people, I never try to avoid MI (in other
words, I use MI when I feel a need for it)
2) I just cannot see how MI would be used here
3) this is some old code, I wouldn't write code just
to compete with other boost proposals ;-)
4) I am sure we can get the best of every potentially
competing proposals at the same time
For those who haven't downloaded my comparison_ops.H
header, here is the hierarchy:
EqualtyComparable
/ \
TotalyOrdered LessThanComparable
-- Valentin Bonnard ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk