[boost] Re: Misc library documentation issues

From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-10 08:25:56

At 08:31 PM 7/9/99 -0400, Dave Abrahams wrote:

>> Also, the sentence "For functions which can throw std::bad_alloc,
empty
>> throw specifiers are not supplied." is confusing.  Of course empty
>> throw specifiers woundn't be supplied.
>
>I think I made this argument earlier, but it didn't make it into the
docs.

My fault.  I should have changed it when Dave originally mentioned
it.  I have now removed the word "empty".

But that it just a patch; the real need is do rewrite the whole
paragraph, and I don't feel I understand enough to do that yet.
Maybe if someone summarizes these discussions...

--Beman

------------------------------------------------------------------------

eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications