From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-28 19:15:51
> 3) #include <boost/stdint.hpp>, and supply same. Names in namespace
> boost. Cons: If <cstdint> becomes either common or standardized,
> Boost is out-of-step.
How badly out-of-step? This looks like the best to me. All other cons seem
much worse than this one. If <cstdint> becomes standard, we can change
boost/stdint.hpp to have using-declarations from std.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk