Boost logo

Boost :

From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-28 19:15:51

> 3) #include <boost/stdint.hpp>, and supply same. Names in namespace
> boost. Cons: If <cstdint> becomes either common or standardized,
> Boost is out-of-step.

How badly out-of-step? This looks like the best to me. All other cons seem
much worse than this one. If <cstdint> becomes standard, we can change
boost/stdint.hpp to have using-declarations from std.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at