From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-28 20:07:08
At 08:15 PM 7/28/99 -0400, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>> 3) #include <boost/stdint.hpp>, and supply same. Names in
>> boost. Cons: If <cstdint> becomes either common or standardized,
>> Boost is out-of-step.
>How badly out-of-step? This looks like the best to me. All other
>much worse than this one. If <cstdint> becomes standard, we can
>boost/stdint.hpp to have using-declarations from std.
(3) is certainly less likely to have unintended side effects that an
approach that puts stuff in namespace std.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk