From: Valentin Bonnard (Bonnard.V_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-08-17 11:10:05
Beman Dawes wrote:
> * As an implementation artifact unrelated to the specification,
> <boost/stdint.h> and thus <boost/cstdint.hpp> #include <limits.h>.
> This allows an implementation portable to many (most?) modern
> computer systems, but has the side effect of defining a bunch of
> macros (xxx_MAX/xxx_MIN/etc). Should these be #undef'ed at the end
> of boost/stdint.h?
Certainly not ! Never ever do that ! These have reserved names.
Anyway, DO_THEY_REALLY_HURT ?
-- Valentin Bonnard
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk