From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-09-14 19:39:54
> g) Change expression compilation to
> support dfa style searching for those
> expressions that are capable of it, this
> will enable the library to give worst-case
> performance guarantees in these cases, and
> hopefully address the reservations
> expressed on the mailing list.
Just to make my position clear:
Of course I like this proposal, but I wouldn't insist on it for a first
release within boost. Regex++ seems to be a fine, useful library even
without DFA searching.
P.S. OTOH, regex++ is already available w/o DFA searching, so maybe it would
be a good idea ;)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk