From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-11-17 12:42:57
At 08:30 AM 11/17/99 -0600, Ed Brey wrote:
>I just noticed a couple new issues, this time regarding the
>class. First, only the less_than_comparable base class is public,
>all other base classes are private. Since everything is done
>friends, and the base classes themselves have no public members,
>probably just as well to make all the base classes private.
>Second, since all the base classes have specialization where needed
>deal with identically typed parameters, the specialization for
>operators doesn't seem to be needed.
Both of those issues are oversights on my part. I have changed
operators.hpp on the web site after re-tested with GCC, CodeWarrior,
and Visual C++.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk