From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-12-29 12:16:53
>> There's a lot of use of "(void)" for parameter lists. Since it's C++, I
>> suggest you use "()" instead.
> OK, I'll change this one -- stylistic convention. . . I do prefer to use
> "(void)" for overloaded operators, though.
Why? Noting that "(void)" was added for compatibility with Standard C, I
only use it if there is a special reason to do so. Does "(void)" make
operator declarations clearer in some way that I'm overlooking?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk