Date: 1999-12-29 12:29:40
> >> There's a lot of use of "(void)" for parameter lists. Since it's C++, I
> >> suggest you use "()" instead.
> > OK, I'll change this one -- stylistic convention. . . I do prefer to
> > "(void)" for overloaded operators, though.
> Why? Noting that "(void)" was added for compatibility with Standard C, I
> only use it if there is a special reason to do so. Does "(void)" make
> operator declarations clearer in some way that I'm overlooking?
Just a personal preference, especially for the parenthesis operator:
It doesn't really matter.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk