From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-12-31 08:39:42
At 02:00 PM 12/30/99 -0800, Darin Adler wrote:
>I believe that back in early November we agreed that implicit_cast
>back to its simple implementation, without the attempts to disable
>numeric conversion warnings. (The thread was called "why
>should not disable warnings"). But the change is not in the latest
> 1) A (last?) call for objections.
> 2) A reminder to Beman to make the change in a future version.
> 3) An offer to help (make the change myself and send you a
I have been wondering if we have a clear enough idea of what
implicit_cast is supposed to do to make it worthwhile. Otherwise we
should just remove it.
Thanks for the offer to help. Yes, go ahead and make changes, then
let's take a look at it and see if it still serves a useful purpose.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk