From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-12-31 09:07:14
At 07:29 PM 12/30/99 -0500, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>>It seems to me that it ought to be changed to
>>> #if defined(BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATES) \
>>> || !defined( BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_FRIENDS )
>> I don't see that. The point of making the privates public was to
>> allow member templates to work even when member template friends
>> didn't. So what is the point if there are no member templates at
>> all? Or am I missing something?
>If member templates are not supported, the private data members
>private. We only need to make them public when member templates are
>supported AND member template friends are unsupported. To rephrase,
>to make them private if member templates are unsupported OR member
>friends are not unsupported.
Got it. Changed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk