|
|
Boost : |
From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-11 23:09:41
Jeremy,
It looks quite good to me. One problem: it's going to be hard to satisfy the
"amortized constant time swap" requirement for the array<> implementation
we're thinking of, I think :(
-Dave
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk